Six months after the Brexit vote the UK government has
singularly failed to say what BREXIT might mean. An inordinate amount of attention has been
focused on trade deals, whether the UK might follow the Norwegian. Swiss or
Canadian routes or negotiate its own á la carte approach (in their dreams). All the focus of newspapers and political
circles has been on what it means for trade.
But something is missing. A large portion of leave voters
voted so in order that the UK is once again able to control immigration (I will
not play the card that some, and perhaps a considerable number, of leave voters
might not have distinguished between migration within EU countries, which the
UK is not currently able to control and migration from outside the EU, which it
is).
But no-one in the government or even in the think tanks that
are flourishing on the back of all this uncertainty have, to my knowledge, even
started to talk about the nitty gritty: what types of EU migrants are/will be welcome
in the UK and who will not be welcome.
This is surely the key issue (well, at least, legally) on which any attempt
at a Brexit negotiation is going to be built. The UK’s health and care services, education
system, agriculture and food processing industries, trucking industry and a
host of others are all very highly dependent
on an ‘immigrant work force’. All of
them are looking for special treatment. So
far no-one has discussed what criteria will be established for deciding which
migrants will be welcome and which not.
(Apart from hitting out at students, but they are all always a soft
touch aren’t they: the UK’s universities might not be such a soft touch) .
Equally no-one has even mentioned how restrictions on freedom of movement to and presumably from the UK will be enforced. Yes UK never signed up to Schengen so still has immigration checks at ports and airports. But will this imply that all EU visitors to the UK have to get a visa before coming to the UK or on arrival (and vice versa). Who is going to foot the bill for that? How many immigration officials will have to be employed – on the front-line and in the back-rooms.
To add to the uncertainty little or nothing has been said
about the future status of EU nationals already resident in the UK (and again
vice-versa). Some EU nationals have already applied for UKcitizenship and been turned for technical reasons (like needing to travel
between the UK and the rest of the EU on a regular basis and thus being not able
to surrender their passport to the Home Office for an indefinite period of time).
They have been treated by illegal
immigrants receiving advice from the Home Office to make preparations to leave
the UK, something that must be deeply distressing to them as their status as
lawful resident has not changed, and will not change, until the negotiations
following the triggering of Article 50
have been concluded. This does not give me
much confidence that the government or Home Office actually knows what it is
doing.
So to summarise there are four unresolved questions around
the core issue of ‘getting our borders back’.
- What will be the criteria on which the UK decides which EU immigrants are welcome to stay and work in the UK (or not)?
- How will it enforce them?
- How much will that will cost, both the government and the applicants?
- What of the status of those already resident in the UK?
These questions are not easily answered, but they should be
things that are being talked about
2 comments:
And what of the status of British Citizens living in the EU? Will they be granted continuation of their existing rights as EU citizens once that Citizenship is stripped away? Will they need documentation from their host state? Will they retain freedom of movement within the remaining 27? What will be the position of their non British, non EU spouses presently accorded rights by virtue of their EU citizen spouse?
Nigel
I agree -but those issues are out of the UK goverenment's hands once they invoke Article 50.
Post a Comment